Dismissed

Ajay Mahato v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Nov 2019CWJC/21701/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order where the Bihar Land Tribunal set aside an Additional Collector's mutation appeal decision. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the Additional Collector lacked jurisdiction, holding that such appeals lie before the Deputy Circle Land Record Officer. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the appropriate court regarding

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate court against the order of Circle Officer mutating the names of respondents No. 6 to 11.

Ajay Mahato Vs The State of Bihar — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21701 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ajay Mahato son of Deonath Mahato resident of Village Bhanpur Badawa, P.O. Padmaul, P.S. Goraul, District- Vaishali, through Power of Attorney given by Udayan Prasad, son of Late Anshuman Prasad, resident of Village Chandpur Khurd, P.S. Goraul, District Vaishali, at present residing at 83/011 ONGC Colony Gokul Dhan Goregaon, East Mumbai- 63.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna.

¶7

The Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶8

The Additional Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶9

The D.C.L.R., Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶10

The Circle Officer Goraul Anchal Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶11

Rajendra Prasad @ Brig Rajendra Prasad @ Bauaji son of Late Bhagwat Prasad at present residing at 35 Vijayrattan Vihar Sector 15/2 Gurgaoin, Hariyana- 122001, permanent resident of Village Chandpura Khurd, P.S. Goraul, District- Vaishali.

¶12

Uma Shankar Prasad son of Late Ambika Prasad at present residing at 828, 11th Main 7th Cross, B.T.M. IInd Stage Bangalore- 560076, permanent resident of Village Chandpura Khurd, P.S. Goraul, District- Vaishali.

¶13

Chandeshwar Prasad son of Lage Bhagwat Prasad at present residing at Haridhar Apartment, Dhakuria Kolkata- 700031.

¶14

Purnendu Prasad son of Late Bhagwat Prasad at presen resident at Sector 73 Noida Gautam Budha Nagar- 201301 (U.P.)

¶15

Rishikesh Narayan son of Late Ambika Prasad at present residing at 401, H.C.L. Tower, Sector 62 Noida (U.P.)

¶16

Vinay Vardhan Prasad son of Late Niranjan Prasad Kadina Sonari Link, Jamshedpur- 831002.

¶17

Dr. Sridhar Prasad son of Late Niranjan Prasad resident at Dandrapuram, Shaziabad 201014 (U.P.).

¶18

... ... Respondent/s

¶19

======================================================

¶20

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ratan Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Subash Chandra Yadav (GP15) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶21

2 05-11-2019 Heard both sides.

¶22

The petitioner filed this writ petition to quash the

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.21701 of 2019(2) dt.05-11-2019 2/3

¶24

order dated 02.05.2019 (Annexure-8) passed by the Member (Administrative), Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna (B.L.T.) in B.L.T. case No. 286 of 2017 by which the learned Member, B.L.T. set aside the order dated 19.01.2017 (Annexure-4) passed by the Additional Collector, Vaishali in Jamabandi Vibhajan Appeal No. 2/2014-15.

¶25

The learned counsel for the petitioner assailed the order of the learned Member (Administrative), B.L.T. on the ground that the same was passed ex party. It is submitted that petitioner had purchased the land after partition of the property but during the course of consolidation proceeding the aforesaid land was entered in the names of respondent No. 6 to 11 and on the basis of such entry made by the Consolidation Officer the Circle Officer mutated the names of respondent No. 6 to 11 in the record of rights. When the petitioner came to know about mutation of names of respondents No. 6 to 11 in the record of rights, the petitioner filed appeal before the Additional Collector and the Additional Collector rightly set aside the order of the Circle Officer mutating the names of respondents No. 6 to 11 but the learned Member (Administrative), B.L.T. set aside the order of the Additional Collector on the ground that the Additional Collector has got no jurisdiction to hear appeal under

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.21701 of 2019(2) dt.05-11-2019 3/3

¶27

the Bihar Mutation Act, 2011

¶28

After perusal of the Bihar Mutation Act, I find that the Additional Collector has got no jurisdiction to hear mutation appeal. The mutation appeal against the order of Circle Officer lies before the D.C.L.R. and, therefore, the Additional Collector has got no jurisdiction to set aside the order of Circle Officer while hearing mutation appeal.

¶29

Thus, I find that the learned Member (Administrative), B.L.T. has rightly set aside the order of the Additional Collector passed in Jamabandi Vibhajan Appeal No. 2/2014-15 as the same is without jurisdiction. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate court against the order of Circle Officer mutating the names of respondents No. 6 to 11.

¶30

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶31

BKS/-

¶32

Ajay Mahato v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Mahato v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogendra Pandey and Anr. Vs Sunaina Devi and Ors.

Puja Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Bablu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Lalit Yadav @ Lalit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Lagan Sah @ Lagan Sah Vs The State of Bihar