Dismissed

Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Nov 2019CR. MISC./68080/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order deals with a plea for anticipatory bail filed by Sushil Kumar Singh in a case involving assault on police and recovery of illicit liquor. The High Court refused the bail application, rejecting the applicant's plea of political candidacy and enmity as insufficient grounds.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner not enlarged on bail.

Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68080 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2019 Thana- GORIAKOTHI District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Singh, Aged about 35 years, Male, Son of Hari Singh @ Harinath Singh, Resident of Village Chainpur, P.S. Goreyakothi, District Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raju Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 05-11-2019 Heard both sides.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Goreyakothi P.S. Case No.118 of 2019, registered under Sections 353 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶12

The informant alleged that during the course of patrolling, the informant spotted a person hiding behind a closed Gumti . The person was apprehended with liquor but Sushil Kumar Singh, the petitioner, who was a candidate of Mukhiya, and other villagers assaulted the police personnel and got the apprehended accused, Bablu freed from the custody of the police.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68080 of 2019(2) dt.05-11-2019 2/2

¶15

petitioner was a candidate of Mukhiya and that is why at the instance of his enemy he has also been implicated in this case but the informant has got no enmity with the petitioner and the informant made allegation that it was the petitioner and his men who assaulted the informant and others and got the apprehended accused freed from the custody of the police.

¶16

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

¶17

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶18

S.KUMAR/-

¶19

U T

Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogendra Pandey and Anr. Vs Sunaina Devi and Ors.

Puja Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Bablu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ajay Mahato Vs The State of Bihar

Lalit Yadav @ Lalit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Lagan Sah @ Lagan Sah Vs The State of Bihar