Allowed

Yubraj Raja Ji v. Pradip Kumar and Ors.

Patna HC22 Nov 2019CWJC/19530/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed a writ petition against orders debarring a defendant from filing a written statement. The petitioners were directed to pay Rs. 10,000 to respondents' counsel, and the defendant was given six weeks to file a written statement under threat of forfeiture.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; petitioner to pay Rs. 10,000 to respondents' counsel; defendant no. 1 to file written statement within six weeks; impugned orders set aside.

Yubraj Raja Ji Vs Pradip Kumar and Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19530 of 2012

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Yubraj Raja Ji son of Sri Badri Prasad Proprietor of M/s Base Builders And Structural Engineers, Resident of Devendar Mukherjee Road, Kolkata- 9, West Bengal

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

Pradip Kumar son of Gridhari Rai Goenka Resident of Lal Bazar, Bettia Town, West Champaran At Lal Bazar, Bettia Town, West Champaran At Present Residing Flat No.- 501, Shashi Kutir, Exhibition Road, Patna, Police Station- Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna

¶8

Smt. Anita Goenka Wife Of Pradip Kumar Resident of Lal Bazar, Bettia Town, West Champaran At Lal Bazar, Bettia Town, West Champaran at Present Residing Flat No.- 501, Shashi Kutir, Exhibition Road, Patna, Police Station- Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna

¶9

Dr. Shiv Kumar Sinha Son of Late Brindawan Bihari Lal Resident of Shashi Kutir, Exhibition Road, Patna, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Dist.- Patna

¶10

Smt. Shashi Bijpusia Wife of Sri Rameshwar Prasad Bijpuria Resident of Shashi Kutir, Flat No.- 402 Duplex, Exhibition Road, Patna, Patna StationGandhi Maidan, District- Patna

¶11

Ashok Kumar Singh Son of Ramayan Singh Kusunda Area, Post- Kusunda, Bharat Cooking Coal Limited, Dhanbad

¶12

Aasra Grih Nirman Samiti through its Administrator District Co-Operative Officer, Patna

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Triloki Nath Maitin, Sr. Advocate Mr.Jawahar Pd. Singh For the Respondent No. 4: Mr. Sudhir Kumar Bijpuria ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶15

7 22-11-2019

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only issue in the present case is that the defendant no. 1, in the aforesaid suit bearing Title Suit No. 286 of 1997, pending before the learned court of Sub-Judge-V, Patna, has been debarred from filing the written statement, vide order dated 29.02.2000, on account of the delay which has taken place in filing the same and further the petition filed for recall of the said order dated 29.02.2000 has also been rejected by the impugned order dated

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.19530 of 2012(7) dt.22-11-2019 2/2

¶18

18.08.2012 passed by the learned Sub-Judge-V, Patna.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents herein i.e. the respondent nos. 1 & 2, who are the plaintiffs in the suit proceedings, submits that appropriate cost be imposed and a time frame be fixed for the purposes of filing of written statement by the defendant no. 1 to the suit.

¶20

Having regard to there being no opposition on behalf of the learned counsel for the plaintiffs to the suit, I deem it fit and proper to direct the petitioner herein to pay a sum of Rs. 10,000/(Rs. Ten thousand), to the learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 & 2, within a period of two weeks from today. It is further directed that the defendant no. 1 to the suit shall file appropriate written statement within a period of six weeks from today, failing which his right to file the written statement shall stand forfeited forever.

¶21

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands allowed and the orders dated 29.02.2000 and 18.08.2012 passed in Title Suit No. 286 of 1997 by the learned Sub-Judge-V, Patna are set aside.

¶22

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶23

S.Sb/-

¶24

Yubraj Raja Ji v. Pradip Kumar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yubraj Raja Ji v. Pradip Kumar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Gaddi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mithilesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Piyaria Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Muslim Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sharwan Roy @ Shrawan Roy Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Basudev Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.