Disposed

Ranju Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC30 Aug 2019CWJC/17711/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a writ petition seeking direction for payment of unpaid salary. The court directed the District Programme Officer to verify records and ensure salary payment if valid appointment and regular service are established.

What did the court decide?

Direction to District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj to verify record and ensure salary payment for periods worked within sixty days.

Ranju Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17711 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ranju Kumari D/o Sri Indrajeet Prasad Singh, W/o Krishna Kumar Prasad resident of Village and P.O. Khajuria, P.S. Sindhwalia, District Gopalganj.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶7

The District Education Officer, Gopalganj.

¶8

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj.

¶9

The Block Education Officer, Barauli, P.O. and P.S. Barauli, DistrictGopalganj.

¶10

The Headmaster, New Primary School, Khajuria, Upadhyay Tola, P.O. Khajuria, P.S. Sindhwalia, District- Gopalganj.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhat Ranjan Singh (Aag15) ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 30-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶18

Petitioner is aggrieved on account of non payment of salary for the period July 2015 to November,2016 and from April 2018 on wards.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner was validly appointed and he is regularly working yet petitioner is not being paid salary.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj to verify the record and on

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.17711 of 2019(2) dt.30-08-2019 2/2

¶22

verification of the record,if it is found that the petitioner was validly appointed and she is regularly working, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj shall ensure payment of the salary to the petitioner for the period the petitioner has worked.

¶23

Necessary decision in this regard may be taken within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶24

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

¶25

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶26

Ravi/-

¶27

Ranju Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranju Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanju Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Shashank Shekhar @ Shashank Vs All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Barnwal @ Ranjit Kumar Barnwal @ Ranjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar