Disposed

Dharmendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC30 Aug 2019CWJC/17602/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna discussed a Writ Petition alleging non-payment of salary since October 2015 to an appointed Panchayat Teacher. The court ordered the District Programme Officer to verify records and ensure salary payment within three months if the appointment was valid.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent-District Programme Officer (Establishment) to verify records and ensure payment of salary within three months if appointment was valid.

Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17602 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dharmendra Kumar, Son of Sachidanand Singh Resident of Village-Kaji bigha, Police Station -Nardiganj, District-Nawada

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Director Primary Education, Bihar, Patna

¶8

¶9

The District Magistrate Nawada

¶10

The District Education Officer Nawada

¶11

The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Nawada

¶12

The Block Education Officer Nardiganj, District-Nawada

¶13

The Head Master Primary School, Kaji bigha, Block-Nardiganj, DistrictNawada

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, For the Respondent/s : Mr.Mukund Mohan Jha, AC to GP 27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 30-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶17

The grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is non-payment of salary since October, 2015 till date.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner was legally and validly appointed and working as Panchayat Teacher since 1.7.2006 but without any rhyme or reason the petitioner has not been paid salary. Taking work and denying salary is violative of Article 23 of the Constitution of India.

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.17602 of 2019(2) dt.30-08-2019 2/2

¶20

The issue as to payment of salary requires verification of the records.

¶21

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nawada to verify the records and after verification if he comes to the conclusion that the petitioner has been legally and validly appointed and worked for the period he is claiming salary, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nawada shall ensure payment of salary for the period the petitioner has worked. Necessary decision in this regard must be taken by the respondent-District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nawada at the earliest preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶22

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed

¶23

of.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶25

spandey/-

¶26

Dharmendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanju Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Shashank Shekhar @ Shashank Vs All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Ranju Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Barnwal @ Ranjit Kumar Barnwal @ Ranjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar