Allowed

Abhishek Kumar Dubey v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Aug 2019CWJC/17330/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench order disposed of writ petition regarding discrimination in issuance of appointment letter to petitioner for post of Prakhand Teacher after Authority decision, directing respondents to decide within 60 days.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to decide claim of petitioner in light of District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority direction within 60 days.

Abhishek Kumar Dubey Vs The State of Bihar — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17330 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Abhishek Kumar Dubey Son of Jai Prakash Dubey Resident of VillageChakari, P.O.- Chakari, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

¶10

The District Programming Officer, Establishment, Siwan.

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Siswan, Siwan.

¶12

The Block Education Officer, Siswan, Siwan.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Bijay Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 23 ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 27-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Respondent State.

¶17

The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is discrimination in the issuance of joining letter on the post of 'Prakhand Teacher', in compliance of decision of the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the decision of the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority is in relation to appointment of 22 candidates on the post of 'Prakhand Teachers'. Out of 22 candidates, 5 have been

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.17330 of 2019(2) dt.27-08-2019 2/2

¶20

offered appointment and without any rationale justification the respondents have not issued appointment letter in favour of the petitioner although the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority decided the case of all candidates.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid, the present writ application stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take appropriate decision with regard to the claim of the petitioner in light of the direction issued by the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶22

With the aforesaid, the present writ application stands disposed of.

¶23

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶24

uma/-

¶25

Abhishek Kumar Dubey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhishek Kumar Dubey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Farooque Ahmad, Vs The State of Bihar.

Prof. Narendra Nath Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Prem Prakash Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Angad Kumar Arzoo Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Madhuri Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Karuna Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.