Petitioner filed a writ application which stands disposed of as the respondents had issued a corrigendum rectifying the mistake, rendering the present application infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17315 of 2019
======================================================
Prem Prakash Mishra S/o Sri Baijnath Mishra Resident of Village- Bhakura, Near Surya Mandir, Police Station- Tarari, District- Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy 1, S.C. 13
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
ORAL ORDER
2 26-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Respondent State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, with reference to the corrigendum dated 22.08.2019, would submit that the respondents have rectified their mistake and they have issued corrigendum to that extent and as such the present writ application stands infructuous.
In view of the notification of corrigendum dated 22.08.2019, the present writ application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
uma/- U
Prem Prakash Mishra
The State of Bihar
The Additional Chief Secretary-cum-the Principal Secretary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar
The Deputy Secretary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar
The Director Primary Education, Bihar
The District Magistrate Ara
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
