Disposed

Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC21 May 2019CWJC/14960/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this oral order, the court acted on the petitioner's application for substitution following his demise during pendency. The application was allowed, substituting the petitioner's wife, and the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to assail a related rejected service appeal.

What did the court decide?

IA No. 1405 of 2016 allowed; substitution of petitioner's wife; writ petition disposed with liberty to assail rejected Service Appeal.

Vijay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 14960 of 2014

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Vijay Kumar, S/o Late Sheo Narayan Choudhary, resident of villageShamshernagar, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Govt of Bihar, Patna

¶7

Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya

¶8

District Magistrate -cum- Collector, Aurangabad

¶9

District Nazarat Deputy Collector, Aurangabad

¶10

Circle Officer, Obera, Aurangabad

¶11

Circle Officer, Haspura, Aurangabad

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Banwari Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr Sanjay Kumar, AC to GA XIII

¶16

======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

3 21-05-2019

¶20

Matter has been listed today in the Summer Vacation

¶21

as the learned counsel for the petitioner was desirous for consideration of his case during vacation.

¶22

Slip for listing was filed pursuant to notice dated 08th May 2019, published prior to vacation

¶23

Matter is, accordingly, taken up for consideration as both parties are present and willing to assist the Court for disposal of the matter.

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.14960 of 2014(3) dt.21-05-2019 2/2

¶26

It is submitted by Mr Banwari Sharma appearing for the petitioner that IA No 1405 of 2016 was filed in view of demise of the petitioner during pendency of the instant proceedings. Wife of the original petitioner Manjulata Devi has sought substitution.

¶27

IA No 1405 of 2016 is allowed.

¶28

Let the name of Manjulata Devi be substituted in place of the original petitioner.

¶29

It is further submitted by Mr Sharma that Service Appeal No 92 of 2014-2015 has already been rejected by order dated 28.12.2015 passed by Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya,.

¶30

In view of the said development during pendency of the writ proceeding, he seeks liberty to assail the same in appropriate proceeding.

¶31

With liberty, as aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶32

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶33

M.E.H. /-

¶34

Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopalji Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sikandar Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Srinath Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mala Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Neelam Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sheo Shankar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.