Dismissed

Md. Islam @ Quazi Md. Islam v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC12 Jul 2019CR. REV./491/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed the revision application against an ex parte maintenance order requiring the petitioner to pay Rs. 2,000 monthly to his legally wedded wife, finding no illegality in the Family Court's decision based on findings regarding income and marital status.

What did the court decide?

The revision application was dismissed, upholding the maintenance order directing payment of Rs. 2,000 per month to the respondent.

Md. Islam @ Quazi Md. Islam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Maintenance and Alimony | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.491 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Islam @ Quazi Md. Islam son of Abdul Jabbar, Resident of villagePuranaganj, Post Office- Puranaganj, Police Station- Baisi, District- Purnea.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Bihar

¶8

Yasmin Khatoon wife of Md. Islam, daughter of Md. Mustaque, at present of village- Baluganj, P.O. Kirora, Police Station- Balrampur, District- Katihar.

¶9

... ... Respondents

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s : Mr.Dr. Ajit Kumarapp

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶15

7 12-07-2019

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned counsel for the State.

¶17

This application has been filed against the order dated 10.04.2015 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar in Maintenance Case No. 258 of 2012, by which, learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar has directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 2,000/- per month to the opposite party no. 2 towards her maintenance from the date of order in the first week of each month.

¶18

It further appears that in spite of substituted service of notice to the petitioner, he has not appeared before the Court below, as such, the maintenance case proceeded ex parte and three witnesses were examined on behalf of opposite party no. 2. After conclusion of proceeding, learned Additional Principal Judge, Family

¶19

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.491 of 2016(7) dt.12-07-2019 2/2

¶20

Court, Katihar come to the conclusion that opposite party no. 2 is the legally wedded wife of petitioner and petitioner has performed second marriage and, thus, directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 2,000/to opposite party no. 2 per month towards her maintenance.

¶21

Being aggrieved, the petitioner has preferred the present revision application. However, it appears that on 02.07.2019, 09.07.2019 and on 11.07.2019, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner but learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 was present on all the three dates. It further appears that the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar has come to the finding that opposite party no. 2 is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner and she was ousted from the her matrimonial house and she is residing in her maike and she has no source of income to maintain herself and petitioner has regular source of income and he has cultivable lands also and apart from that he is maintaining his second wife.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any illegality in the order dated 10.04.2015 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar in Maintenance Case No. 258 of 2012.

¶23

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

¶24

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶25

sunilkumar/- U T

Md. Islam @ Quazi Md. Islam v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Islam @ Quazi Md. Islam v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laldev Sada Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Pravej Yadav @ Parvez Alam and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Satish Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sohan Yadav and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Jitendra Yadav Vs the State of Bihar