This order dismissed an application for anticipatory bail (Criminal Misc. No. 18414 of 2019) because the petitioners failed to appear despite repeated calls, despite a prior rejection of similar relief in May 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18414 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2016 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia
======================================================
. ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
5 11-07-2019 Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Amaur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Earlier prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners was rejected by this Court, vide order dated 04.05.2017 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 18002 of 2017 and the petitioners were directed to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, but again the application for anticipatory bail has been filed by them.
On repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the
petitioners.
In such view of the matter, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
Sunil Shukla/-
U T
Pravej Yadav Parvez Alam
Doman Yadav Doma Yadav
The State of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
