Criminal Revision allowed as the petitioner, having been acquitted by the lower court, was granted permission to withdraw the application, which was then dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission accorded to withdraw the criminal revision application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.32 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2018 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran
======================================================
Niraj Kumar, Son of Daroga Ray, resident of Village- Natha Chapra, Police Station- Dariyapur, District- Saran at Chapra, Under Guardianship of Shilu Devi, Wife of Daroga Ray, mother of the Appellant and guardian.
... ... Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr.Ram Binod Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal revision application in connection with Cr. (Juvenile) Appeal No. 69 of 2018 (arising out of Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2018), pending in the court of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra, as the petitioner has already been acquitted by the learned learned court below.
Permission is accorded.
The present criminal revision application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
U.K./-
U T
Niraj Kumar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
