Bail plea rejected. Court refused to grant bail to petitioner charged with offence under sections 307, 387, 504, 506 IPC and 27 Arms Act due to lack of inclination considering criminal antecedents and prosecution case involving firing to demand rangdari.
Prayer for bail rejected; petitioner left in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14034 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2018 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
RAM PRAVESH MAHTO Son of Mathura Mahto Resident of Village - Rata, P.S.- Halsi, District - Lakhisarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhakar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 08-07-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP
for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 307, 387, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
The prosecution case in short is that the accused persons demanded rangdari from the informant and on denial fired at him due to which he sustained injury.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 5.11.2018. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Due to previous enmity, the petitioner has been made accused.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14034 of 2019(4) dt.08-07-2019 2/2
There is case and counter complaint case between the parties. The injury is on the non-vital part of the body.
On behalf of the State and the informant, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. The petitioner had demanded rangdari and on refusal he fired causing fire arms injury on the left arm. The petitioner has criminal antecedents.
Considering the same, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 163/2018. Prayer is rejected at this stage.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Pankaj/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving sections 307, 387, 504, 506 IPC and 27 of the Arms Act.
Ram Pravesh Mahto
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
