Allowed

Sayam Babu Rai @ Shaym Babu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC30 Jan 2019CR. MISC./80252/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner in police case No. 402 of 2018 involving dacoity and cheating, noting the petitioner's custody since capture and the fact that similarly situated co-accused had been released on bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Sayam Babu Rai @ Shaym Babu Rai Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.80252 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-402 Year-2018 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sayam Babu Rai @ Shyam Babu Rai, Son of Ramchandra Rai, Resident of Village- Rampur Aami, P.S.- Dighwara, District- Saran, presently residing at- Road No. 4, Indranagar, Postal Park, P.S.- Jakkanpur, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Samir Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 30-01-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶13

The petitioner is in custody since 26.11.2018 in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No.402 of 2018 registered for the offence under Sections 420, 379, 34 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was some dacoity committed in the jewellery shop of the informant and it was alleged that two persons stating to be the police officers had conducted the raid in their premises, but later on it was found that they were imposters and therefore the case was lodged. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., subsequently, in

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.80252 of 2018(2) dt.30-01-2019 2/2

¶16

the confessional statement made before the police by one Manoj Kumar alias Manoj Verma, the name of the petitioner has surfaced. It is further submitted that another person, namely, Ved Nidhi, who has also been named by the said Manoj Kumar, has also been extended the privilege of bail in Cr.Misc. No.60207 of 2018, vide order dated 05.11.2018. The said Manoj Kumar has also been extended the privilege of bail in Cr.Misc. No.64459 of 2018, vide order dated 05.11.2018.

¶17

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances and that the similarly situated persons have been extended the privilege of bail, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Judge-VII-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No.402 of 2018.

¶18

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶19

PNM

¶20

U T

Sayam Babu Rai @ Shaym Babu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sayam Babu Rai @ Shaym Babu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kundan Mukhia @ Udan Mukhia @ Kundan Mukhiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Nitesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ankit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kanchan Yadav @ Kanchan Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Singh @ Chhotan Singh @ Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Ritesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Anish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar