Allowed

Chhotu Singh @ Chhotan Singh @ Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Ritesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC30 Jan 2019CR. MISC./3543/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a PS case involving offences under the Arms Act, releasing him on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

Chhotu Singh @ Chhotan Singh @ Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Ritesh… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3543 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-449 Year-2018 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMuzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chhotu Singh @ Chhotan Singh @ Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Ritesh Kumar, son of Late Vindhyachal Singh, Resident of Village- Kuama, P.S.- Piparahi, District - Sheohar

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramchandra Sahni, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 30-01-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

The petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2018 in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No.449 of 2018 registered for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)A, 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-AAA), 26(ii), 35 of the Arms Act read with Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner and other three persons had collected willingly to surrender before the Office of the Senior Superintendent of Police, they were taken into custody and the present case has been filed against them. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already been in custody for

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3543 of 2019(2) dt.30-01-2019 2/2

¶17

almost seven months and as such, he may be extended the privilege of bail.

¶18

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No.449 of 2018.

¶19

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶20

PNM

¶21

U T

Chhotu Singh @ Chhotan Singh @ Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Ritesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhotu Singh @ Chhotan Singh @ Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Ritesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kundan Mukhia @ Udan Mukhia @ Kundan Mukhiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Nitesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ankit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kanchan Yadav @ Kanchan Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Anish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Multan Ansari @ Mulatan Miya Vs The State Of Bihar