Allowed

Mantun Sada and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jan 2019CR. MISC./80160/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna considered an application for anticipatory bail by petitioners facing arrest in a police case alleging assault and snatching arising from a land dispute. The court observed a counter-case exists and injuries are simple, granting bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties of like amount within four weeks.

Mantun Sada and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.80160 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-335 Year-2018 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mantun Sada, Son of Bishun Sada

¶5

Indal Sada, Son of Bishun Sada

¶6

Bishun Sada, Son of Sahdeo Sada

¶7

Rama Sada, Son of Sahdeo Sada

¶8

Dilbale Sada @ Dilwale Kumar Sada, Son of Nandu Sada

¶9

Bipat Sada @ Dipak Sada, Son of Ashik Sada

¶10

Naresh Sada, Son of Sahdeo Sada

¶11

Dharak Lal Yadav, Son of Late Dhanik Lal Yadav All residents of Village Dih Sanjhauti, P.S. Alauli, District Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar For the State : Mr. B.N. Pandey, APP ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 16-01-2019 Heard both sides.

¶19

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Alauli P.S. Case No.335 of 2018 registered under Section 307 and other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

In sum and substance the allegation is that the petitioners and others had come to the land of the informant and started digging his land. On protest, the petitioners and others assaulted the informant and his family members and also snatched chain, ornaments, cash from their possession.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from the side of the petitioners, Alauli P.S. Case No.336 of 2018 was

¶22

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.80160 of 2018(2) dt.16-01-2019 2/2

¶23

registered against the informant of the present case and others. Petitioner no.4, Rama Sada has alleged in his fardbeyan on which Alauli P.S. Case No.336 of 2018 was registered that Anil Yadav and others made indiscriminate firing and snatched money and other ornaments from the house of the informant and others.

¶24

Considering the facts that there appears case and counter case and the dispute took place due to land dispute and the fact that the injuries found on the persons of the informant and others are simple in nature as submitted by the counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Khagaria in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No.335 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶25

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶26

S.KUMAR/-

¶27

U T

Mantun Sada and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mantun Sada and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Tarbez @ Tabrez @ Md. Tabrez Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Rai @ Mukesh Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonelal Chauhan And Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rahul Rai Vs The State Of Bihar