Allowed

Kundan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jan 2019CR. MISC./1945/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner in a case involving Sections 498A, IPC 323, IPC 354, IPC 494, and IPC 34. The court held that the petitioner, being the complainant's brother-in-law without family ties, is not adequately fettered by the allegations and directed his release on bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties and surrendering within four weeks.

Kundan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1945 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Darbhanga

¶3

====================================================== Kundan Kumar son of Munshi Thakur, resident of village Bhataulia, P.S. Paru, Distt. Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Arbind Kumar Pandey

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 15-01-2019 Heard both sides.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Mahila P.S. Case No.23 of 2018 registered under Sections 498A, 323, 354, 494 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The informant alleged that her husband and other inlaws began to demand cash and other articles as additional dowry and started subjecting to her physical and mental torture. The informant alleged that the petitioner also tried to outrage her modesty and the accused persons are indulged in illegal activities.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is brother-in-law of the complainant. The marriage of complainant was solemnized with Chandan Kumar in the year 2009. The petitioner has no manner of concern with the family

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1945 of 2019(2) dt.15-01-2019 2/2

¶17

affairs of Chandan Kumar and complainant.

¶18

Having considered the facts and the nature of allegation against the petitioner and the fact that the petitioner is brother-in-law of complainant, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Darbhanga in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.23 of 2018, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶20

Harish/-

¶21

U T

Kundan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kundan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Bhartiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Sah @ Vikash Kumar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Sri Niwas Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Tarbez @ Tabrez @ Md. Tabrez Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Rai @ Mukesh Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Tulsi Ram Vs The State Of Bihar