Allowed

Md. Tarbez @ Tabrez @ Md. Tabrez v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jan 2019CR. MISC./80017/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioner apprehending arrest in an IPC case involving false allegation of estrangement and disappearance of ornaments, directing compliance of surety conditions with the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of similar amount to the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, within four weeks.

Md. Tarbez @ Tabrez @ Md. Tabrez Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.80017 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Tarbez @ Tabrez @ Md. Tabrez

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sri Arun Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 15-01-2019 Heard both sides.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Mahila P.S. case No. 35 of 2018 registered under Section 323, 504, 354(B), 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The informant alleged that she was having friendship with Md. Tabrez for last two years. Her family members negotiating for her marriage. The informant informed Md. Tabrez about the negotiation. On such, Md. Tabrez requested her to flee away from the house so that they may solemnize marriage. The informant came out from her house after taking her belongings and ornaments but Md. Tabrez took her ornaments and fled away.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the allegations are false and concocted. When the petitioner did

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.80017 of 2018(2) dt.15-01-2019 2/2

¶16

not agree to marry with the informant the informant lodged this case making false and frivolous allegation. The informant is a major girl.

¶17

Considering the facts aforesaid and the nature of allegation made against the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, Biharsharif in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.35 of 2018, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶19

BKS/-

¶20

U T

Md. Tarbez @ Tabrez @ Md. Tabrez v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Tarbez @ Tabrez @ Md. Tabrez v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Bhartiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Sah @ Vikash Kumar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Sri Niwas Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Rai @ Mukesh Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Tulsi Ram Vs The State Of Bihar