Allowed

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Feb 2019CR. MISC./79362/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed anticipatory bail application of army personnel accused of offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 337, 379, and 34, ordering release upon surrender within six weeks subject to bail bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; petitioner released on bail upon surrender within six weeks on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79362 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2018 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh, Son of Anil Singh, Resident of Village – Kanchanpur, P.S. - Belaganj, District - Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Satya Nand Shukla

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 25-02-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises

¶14

out of Belaganj P.S. Case No. 181/18, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 337, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Allegation as per F.I.R. is that while the informant was returning, petitioner and one Raushan Kumar attacked him and due to which, he fell down and thereafter, he was assaulted by bricks and the accused persons snatched away gold chain and cash of Rs. 2,000/-

¶16

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute and further he is an Army personnel and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him.

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79362 of 2018(3) dt.25-02-2019 2/2

¶19

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 181/18, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This is further subject to the condition that petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police otherwise, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

sunilkumar/-

¶22

U T

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunny Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Satendra Yadav @ Satendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Nagendra Jha and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjeet Mishra @ Ranjeet Kumar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Upendra Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahendra Rai Vs The State Of Bihar