Disposed

Smt. Sarita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Jan 2019CR. MISC./75980/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a school project worker, on the conditional basis of depositing Rs. 3 lacs within six weeks. The court noted the allegation of defalcation based on wrong calculations. The petition was disposed of contingent on compliance.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted conditionally upon deposit of Rs. 3 lacs within six weeks and satisfaction of the concerned court regarding the work completion.

Smt. Sarita Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.75980 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-254 Year-2016 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Smt. Sarita Kumari daughter of Shivsagar Prasad Singh, wife of Sanjeev Singh, Resident of Village- Usraha, P.S. Beldaur, District- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad, A.P.P.

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 29-01-2019 Heard the parties.

¶14

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection

¶15

with Mansi P.S.Case No. 254 of 2016, G.R. No. 2653 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Allegation as per F.I.R. is that the amount of Rs.

¶17

8,93,350/- was paid for construction of the building of the school but the work has not been completed and Rs 2,89, 266/has been defalcated with 9% interest per annum of the said amount.

¶18

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner

¶19

is that the petitioner has not committed any offence rather she has falsely been implicated in the present case due to wrong calculation of the expended amount and the petitioner is still

¶20

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75980 of 2018(3) dt.29-01-2019 2/2

¶21

ready to complete the work which was entrusted to her.

¶22

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶23

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances as discussed above, this application is disposed of with direction that if the petitioner is ready to deposit the rest amount i.e. Rs. 3 lacs within six weeks through the Bank Draft payable to the District Programme Officer and she will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the court concerned itself.

¶24

The deposit of aforesaid amount will be the subject to the result of the case.

¶25

This application is accordingly disposed of.

¶26

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶27

sudha/-

¶28

U T

Smt. Sarita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sarita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niraj Pathak @ Niraj Kumar Pathak Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Pukar Yadav @ Pukar Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Baleshwar Mahtoand Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjit Roy @ Ranjeet Kumar Roy Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Arvind Sah @ Arvind Sahu Vs Sanju Devi and Ors.

Sanjay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar