Dismissed

Sanjay Singh @ Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Jan 2019CR. APP (SJ)/186/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna dismissed a criminal appeal by the appellant seeking pre-arrest bail. The court rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail, noting allegations of bomb explosion causing injury to the informant. The court allowed the appellant to surrender for regular bail consideration within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed; appellant permitted to surrender for regular bail consideration within six weeks.

Sanjay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.186 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2011 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjay Singh @ Ajay Kumar, son of Late Jarman Singh @ Jagat kishore Singh, resident of vill. and P.O. - Merhkuri, P.S. - Meskaur, Distt.- Nawada.

... ... Appellant

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Respondent

======================================================

¶10

Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Sidhendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna, Special P.P.

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT

¶13

Date : 29-01-2019

¶14

This appeal is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the appellant against the order dated 12.9.2018 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-I, Nawada, in ABP No. 1478 of 2018 by which learned Sessions Judge has rejected prayer for pre-arrest bail of the appellant, who has been made accused in Sirdala (Meskaur) P.S.Case No. 98 of 2011 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 323, 325, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3, 4, 5 of Explosive Substance Act, 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶15

Allegation against the appellant is of explosion of bomb, causing injury on the leg of the informant.

¶16

Submission of learned counsel for the appellant is that informant is a veteran criminal and it cannot be ruled out that at the time of preparation of bomb, the same was exploded and as such he received injury.

¶17

Heard learned Special P.P. and perused the injury report from which it appears that informant received splinter injury.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.186 of 2019 dt.29-01-2019 2/2

¶19

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the appellant. If appellant surrenders within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order and, if possible, to be disposed of on the same day.

¶20

With the above observation, the appeal is dismissed.

¶21

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶22

spal/-

¶23

AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date

Sanjay Singh @ Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Singh @ Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niraj Pathak @ Niraj Kumar Pathak Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Pukar Yadav @ Pukar Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Baleshwar Mahtoand Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjit Roy @ Ranjeet Kumar Roy Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Arvind Sah @ Arvind Sahu Vs Sanju Devi and Ors.

Smt. Sarita Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar