Allowed

Ram Pukar Yadav @ Pukar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jan 2019CR. APP (SJ)/68/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an appeal against the rejection of an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 14(A) of the SC/ST Act. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the grant of bail to the appellants.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; anticipatory bail granted on furnishing bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Ram Pukar Yadav @ Pukar Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.68 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2017 Thana- SAHIYARA District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Pukar Yadav @ Pukar Yadav and Anr Son of Guddar Yadav

¶5

Devendra yadav Son of Ram Pukar yadav. Both Resident of Village- Dihthi, P.S. - Sahiyara, District- Sitamarhi

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Smt Usha Kumari No-1

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT

¶13

Date : 25-01-2019

¶14

By way of this memo of appeal,preferred under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, appellants seek for setting aside the order dated 10.12.2018 passed in 30.11.2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of SC/ST Act by the learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (SC./ST Act) Sitamarhi whereby and where-under, the appellant’s application for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected.

¶15

Allegation against the appellants and several accused persons is of abusing the informant by caste name and also assaulted them.

¶16

Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that there is general and omnibus allegation against them and moreover after investigation the police has submitted final form not finding the case true against them and the cognizance has been taken against them.

¶17

Heard learned Special P.P. also.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.68 of 2019 dt.25-01-2019 2/2

¶19

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside, let the appellant, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned spl. judge within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sri Virendra Pratap Singh, 1^st Additional Secession Judge cum Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Sitamarhi in connection with ABP No.1894 of 2018/ 1495 of 2018 arising out of Sahiyara P.S.Case No.179 of 2017 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

chn/-

¶22

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	28.1.2019
Transmission Date	28.1.2019

Ram Pukar Yadav @ Pukar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Pukar Yadav @ Pukar Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumanto Aich Vs Kakoli Aich and Anr.

Raushan Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sadre Alam Khan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Niraj Pathak @ Niraj Kumar Pathak Vs The State Of Bihar

Baleshwar Mahtoand Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhola Sah @ Ram Sushil Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar