Allowed

Pintu Vishwakarma and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC17 Apr 2019CR. MISC./72845/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to two petitioners facing arrest in a charge of assault and obstructing police under Sections 354 and 341/34 IPC. They were directed to execute a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount within six weeks.

Pintu Vishwakarma and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72845 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-485 Year-2017 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pintu Vishwakarma, Son of Krishna Mistri @ Kishna Vishwakarma,

¶5

Nand Kishore Vishwakarma @ Nand Vishwakarma, S/o Ramdhani Vishwakarma, Both resident of Village Khaira, P.S.- Khaira, Dist.- Jamui.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Rekha Devi, Wife of Chulha Rawat, resident of Village Khaira, P.S. Khaira, Dist.- Jamui.

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhat Ranjan Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 17-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶15

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 485C of 2017 registered under Sections 354 and 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

The accusation is that on 13.04.2017, at about 11 P.M., complainant along with her husband and son were sleeping in temporary hut constructed in the field then both petitioners entered in the house and tried to unfold her cloths, on which, she woke up and identified both petitioners in the light of electric bulb. On raising alarm, her husband and son came and

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72845 of 2018(4) dt.17-04-2019 2/2

¶19

tried to caught hold both petitioners but they succeeded to flee away.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to petty dispute both petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case by the informant at the instance of her husband, Chulha Rawat. It is further submitted that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶21

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jamui, in connection with Complaint Case No. 485C of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶23

Bhardwaj/-

¶24

U T

Pintu Vishwakarma and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pintu Vishwakarma and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neyaj Dewan @ Niyaj Dewan Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jyotish Das Vs The State of Bihar

Gagandeo Mandal and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanoj Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Shiv Shankar Kumar Vs The Union Of India Through C.b.i