Allowed

Gagandeo Mandal and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Apr 2019CR. MISC./68622/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting anticipatory bail to three petitioners in a kidnapping case. The court released them in the event of arrest or surrender upon furnishing a bail bond and sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri.

Gagandeo Mandal and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68622 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-426 Year-2017 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Gagandeo Mandal, Son of Late Dasai Mandal

¶5

Marni Devi, wife of Gagandeo Mandal

¶6

Ramu Mandal @ Ramu Kumar Mandl Son of Gagndeo Mandal All Resident of Village-Bhantawari,P.S. Pupri Choraut O.P.,Distt.-Sitamarhi

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

4 17-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶17

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶18

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Pupri P.S. Case no. 426 of 2017, registered under Sections 363, 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

The accusation is that informant Matwar Mandal performed the marriage of his granddaughter with Rohit Mandal, son of Gangandeo Mandal of village Amanpur, P.S. Pupri, District-Sitamarhi in the month of April, 2016, but after marriage his granddaughter was not allowed to talk with her myaka people. Thereafter, informant along with his brother Rambalak Mandal went to the sasural of his granddaughter

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68622 of 2018(4) dt.17-04-2019 2/3

¶21

then came to know that husband and other in-laws have committed kidnapping of his granddaughter to perform her remarriage with another person.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of granddaughter of the informant. He further submits that, in fact, there was love affairs in between granddaughter of the informant and one Awadhesh Das of Bhantawari and after marriage, Awadhesh Das used to come at matrimonial house of granddaughter of the informant on which protest was made, but later on, granddaughter of the informant left the house. He further submits that while the statement of the victim, granddaughter of the informant, was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. in which she simply stated about carrying her at another place and locking in the room from where, anyhow, she succeeded to flee away. Further submission is that witnesses, in paragraph Nos. 59 and 60, have detailed about the love affairs of the granddaughter of the informant with Awadhesh Das, who used to visit at her matrimonial house.

¶23

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68622 of 2018(4) dt.17-04-2019 3/3

¶25

within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 426 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶26

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶27

manish/-

¶28

U T

Gagandeo Mandal and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gagandeo Mandal and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neyaj Dewan @ Niyaj Dewan Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jyotish Das Vs The State of Bihar

Sanoj Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Shiv Shankar Kumar Vs The Union Of India Through C.b.i

Pintu Vishwakarma and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.