The petitioner withdrew the application for regular bail on account of the length of arguments. The court dismissed the withdrawn application. No substantive legal ruling or order on the merits of the bail claim was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55042 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2013 Thana- C.B.I CASE District- Patna
======================================================
Shiv Shankar Kumar, Son of Binod Kumar Singh @ Vinod Singh, Resident of Village- Bariyarpur, P.S.- Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The Union Of India Through C.B.I.
... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar Sinha Sc,Cbi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
At the length of the argument, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays to withdraw this application to pray for regular bail before the trial Court.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the application filed on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
manish/-
U T
Shiv Shankar Kumar
The Union Of India Through C.B.I.
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
