Single judge high court rejected bail prayer due to injury on head, directing trial court to conclude trial within six months unless imminent.
Bail rejected; trial directed to conclude within six months or petitioner enlarged if no fault.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.72628 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2018 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran
======================================================
Madan Choubey Son of Pragas Choubey, resident of Village- Khairwa Choubey Tola, P.S. Malahi, District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Tarun Prasad Mandal ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
and there is injury on the head, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However the trial court is directed to conclude the trial at the earliest preferably within a period of six months, failing which the trial court shall enlarge the petitioner on bail if there is no fault on the part of the petitioner in early conclusion of the trial.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Ravi/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted on account of specific allegations of assault on head with injury.
Whether the trial court should be directed to conclude the trial within six months before enlarging the petitioner on bail.
Madan Choubey
The State Of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
