Allowed

Sanjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Dec 2019CR. MISC./60404/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought bail in a case concerning alleged culpable homicide not amounting to murder and common intention. The court noted lack of antecedents and allowed bail subject to furnishing bonds and strict conditions regarding representation and address.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to conditions including representation on trial dates.

Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60404 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2016 Thana- SAKSOHRA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJEET KUMAR Son of Bhagawan Das Resident of Village-Atnama, P.S.-Barh, District-Patna.

¶5

Jitendra Paswan Son of Bhagawan Das Resident of Village-Atnama, P.S.Barh, District-Patna.

¶6

... ... Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶9

... ... Opposite Party

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 04-12-2019

¶12

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as

¶13

Counsel for the informant and the learned APP for the State. Petitioners are in custody and seek bail in Saksohara PS

¶14

Case No. 13 of 2016 registered under Sections 304 and 34 of the IPC.

¶15

It is submitted by petitioner's Counsel that description of the occurrence as per the FIR makes it abundantly clear that the victim himself had jumped into the water and cause of death has also been found in the Post Mortem Report to be by drowning.

¶16

Learned APP and the Counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail to submit that there are sufficient materials in the investigation to suggest that the deceased had stolen a mobile belonging to the petitioners and for which the instant petitioners had threatened to beat the victim earlier.

¶17

Considering the rival submissions and the fact that the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60404 of 2019(3) dt.04-12-2019 2/2

¶19

petitioners have no criminal antecedents and are in custody since 21.6.2019 this Court is inclined to allow petitioner’s prayer for bail.

¶20

Let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Manoj Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, lst Class, Barh, Patna in Saksohara PS Case No. 13 of 2016 subject to the following conditions:-

¶21

(I) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

¶22

(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date in the trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to the cancelled.

¶23

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶24

SNkumar/-

¶25

U T

Sanjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harendra Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Nitish Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Yadav @ ayushman kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Kauleshwar Yadav @ Kouleshwar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Punit Kumar @ Manish @ Manish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar