Petitioner in custody charged with offences including kidnapping, abduction, and POCSO sought bail alleging false implication. The High Court allowed release on bail upon furnishing bonds and sureties.
Released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60314 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2019 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan
======================================================
MUNNA YADAV @ Ayushman Kumar Son of Vishwanath Yadav @ Bishnath Yadav Resident of Village - Majhwaliya Tole Bhawani Asthan, P.S.Assaon, Dist.- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjan Kumar Dubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
3 04-12-2019
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
Petitioner is in custody in Darauli PS Case No. 86 of 2019 registered under Sections 363, 366A, 372, 354, 420/34 of the IPC and Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act.
It is submitted by petitioner’s Counsel that because the petitioner was a witness against the family of the alleged victim girl in Assaon PS Case No. 6 of 2019 he has falsely been implicated in this case. The falsity is evident from the fact that the alleged occurrence is of 20.5.2019 whereas the FIR was lodged on 27.5.2019. The informant has not disclosed the source of information as at the time of alleged occurrence he was at Mumbai. Petitioner’s Counsel has also placed before this Court today the certified copy of the deposition of the victim Amrita Kumari given under Section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein she has stated that she had gone on her own volition and has married someone
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60314 of 2019(3) dt.04-12-2019 2/2
of her own choice and the case need not proceed any further. Petitioner in such circumstances is in custody since 28.5.2019 on which date he was arrested from his home.
Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail. She submits that the FIR disclosed heinous allegation.
Considering the rival submissions this Court is
inclined to allow the prayer for bail.
Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, lst, -cum- Special Judge, Siwan in Darauli PS Case No. 86 of 2019 subject to the following conditions:-
(I) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date in the trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to the cancelled.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
SNkumar/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in a case involving offences under sections 363, 366A, and POCSO.
MUNNA YADAV @ Ayushman Kumar
THE STATE OF BIHAR
MADHURESH PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
