Ajit Sah v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In bail application under sections 304B, 201, and 120-B IPC for dowry death charges, the High Court denied bail. It directed the trial court to conclude the trial within one year and granted liberty to renew the bail prayer thereafter.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for grant of bail rejected; Trial to be concluded within one year.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.629 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2018 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- Munger
======================================================
Ajit Sah, S/o Mahendra Sah, Resident of village- Dadrijala, P.S. - Sangrampur, District- Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER
3/ 13-03-2019
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in a case involving Dowry Death, Causing Death and Conspiring?
Whether bail should be granted at this stage given the nature of injuries and recovery of body?
Whether the trial court should be directed to expedite the trials in cases involving offences against women?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ajit Sah
- respondent
The State Of Bihar
Coram
Sanjay Priya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court