Dismissed

Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC28 Aug 2019CR. MISC./62459/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an unreported oral order in Criminal Miscellaneous No.62459 of 2018, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail in a case involving forgery and cheating under the IPC. The Court held that the petitioner, named in the FIR with allegations of creating false customers through forged documents, did not deserve such privilege.

What did the court decide?

The prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail is rejected and dismissed.

Sunny Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62459 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-415 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sunny Kumar Son of Ajit Singh, R/o Mohl- Sadikpur Dhanuki, P.S.- Barh Rs, Distt- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bikramdeo Singh Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raju Giri Mr. Santosh Kr. Mishra ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶11

10 28-08-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nawada (Nagar) P.S. Case No. 415 of 2018 registered under Sections 420, 409, 467 and 468/34 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of C.J.M., Nawada.

¶14

Submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to dirty politics. Further submission is that the work of the petitioner was very limited. He only used to collect relevant documents from the borrowing customers and submitted it in the office.

¶15

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62459 of 2018(10) dt.28-08-2019 2/2

¶17

opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that petitioner is named accused in the first information report. Further learned counsel submits that on perusal of paragraph nos. 55, 62, 63 and 66 of the case diary, it appears that petitioner on the basis of forged and fabricated documents created false customers and granted loan and caused huge loss to the Company. Hence, petitioner does not deserve privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶18

Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.

¶19

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶20

shailendra/-

Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Bihar, Patna

Ramjee Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Yadav @ Satendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Abhimanuy Kumar Verma @ Abhimanyu Kumar Verma Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sashi Kumar @ Sashi Singh Vs The State of Bihar