P.H.C.R. MISC. No.34754 of 2019(4) dt.28-08-2019. An accused applicant praying for bail was heard by Justice Arvind Srivastava. The High Court rejected the application holding the accused did not deserve bail due to specific charges in the FIR and involvement in other cases.
Bail application rejected. The petitioner is not entitled to bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34754 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2018 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai
======================================================
SASHI KUMAR @ SASHI SINGH Son of Lalan Singh Resident of VillageMohanpur, P.S.- Begusarai Muffasil, District- Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kalyan Shankar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
4 28-08-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 14 of 2018 registered under sections 363, 384, 385 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of A.C.J.M.-I, Begusarai.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is in custody since 13.02.2019. He is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case.
Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that petitioner is named in the first information report. There is specific allegation against him. Further submission is that petitioner is accused in several cases. He does not deserve the privilege of bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34754 of 2019(4) dt.28-08-2019 2/2
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Accordingly, this application is rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
shailendra/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case under sections 363 and 384/385 of the I.P.C. given existing co-sheltering allegations.
Sashi Kumar @ Sashi Singh
The State of Bihar
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
