Dismissed

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Yadav @ Satendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Aug 2019CR. MISC./28198/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application arising from a murder charge, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for release on bail. The court noted direct allegations of assault with lethal intent resulting in death and refused to accede to the plea.

What did the court decide?

Bail application was rejected; the petitioner is ordered to remain in custody.

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Yadav @ Satendra… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28198 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-373 Year-2018 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SATYENDRA KUMAR @ SATYENDRA YADAV @ SATENDRA YADAV Son of Lal Babu Yadav Resident of Village- Bhaisahi Tola Kodar, P.S.Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj.

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vipin Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lalan Kumar ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 21-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶10

The petitioner is accused in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 373 of 2018 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 302 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of C.J.M., Gopalganj.

¶11

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to land dispute. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 03.12.2018.

¶12

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that it would

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28198 of 2019(4) dt.21-08-2019 2/2

¶14

appear from the F.I.R. itself that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of assault by means of sword on the head of the brother of the informant with intention to kill, as a result of which, he died in course of treatment in the Hospital. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve privilege of bail.

¶15

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Accordingly, this application is rejected.

¶16

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶17

shailendra/-

¶18

U T

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Yadav @ Satendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Yadav @ Satendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Naseem Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar Through Director General Of Police, Cabinet Vigilance Department, Govt. Of Bihar

Jagdish Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bharosa Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Bihar, Patna

Ramjee Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Sri Kant Sah @ Sri Kant Saha @ Sri Kant Mandal Vs The State of Bihar