Partly allowed

Raghu Dipti @ Sanjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Sept 2019CR. MISC./61132/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court modified an order dated 21-08-2019 in an anticipatory bail application. The court deleted the observation requiring the petitioner to pay an amount, as he was not ready for it, while keeping the rest of the order intact.

What did the court decide?

Deleted the observation regarding the petitioner's readiness to pay an amount; the rest of the order remained intact.

Raghu Dipti @ Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61132 of 2019

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51900 of 2019

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1798 Year-2017 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Raghu Dipti @ Sanjay Kumar, Son of Late Raj Kishore Prasad, Resident of Village- Dhurlak, P.S.- Samastipur Mufassil, District- Samastipur.

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

Suresh Prasad, Son of Late Shyam Narayan Prasad, Resident of VillageNikaspur, P.S.- Tajpur and District- Samastipur.

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinay Raj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 25-09-2019 This application has been filed for modification of the order dated 21.08.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 51900 of 2019, by which, the application for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner was disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to surrender and pray for regular bail on the submissions made by the petitioner and also on submission that petitioner is ready to pay the amount, if some reasonable time is granted to him.

¶14

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that so far later part of the order that he is ready to pay the amount, if some reasonable time is granted to the petitioner,

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61132 of 2019(2) dt.25-09-2019 2/2

¶16

petitioner is not ready for that. As such, he wants to modify the order to that extent.

¶17

In such view of the matter, if the observation regarding the petitioner is ready to pay the amount, if some reasonable time is granted to him, stands deleted.

¶18

The rest part of the order shall stand remain intact.

¶19

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶20

Sunil Shukla/-

¶21

U T

Raghu Dipti @ Sanjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raghu Dipti @ Sanjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Bahadur Choudhary @ Badhu Chaudhari Vs The State of Bihar

Sachidanand Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Shamshad @ Md. Shamshad Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Bihari Singh @ Bindo Bihari Singh Vs The State of Bihar