Allowed

Sanjay Sao and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC28 Jan 2019CR. MISC./79187/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, directing them to surrender within four weeks on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC, conditioned on surrender within four weeks.

Sanjay Sao and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.79187 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-757 Year-2018 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjay Sao S/o- Ram Das Sao,

¶5

Sonu Sao S/o- Sanjay Sao, R/o Village-Pachna, P.S. and District-Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dr. Anjani Pd. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 28-01-2019 Heard both sides.

¶13

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sheikhpura P.S. Case No.757 of 2018 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

The S.H.O. of Sheikhpura P.S. alleged that he got information that Sanjay Sao and Sonu Sao (petitioners) with the help of Manoj Sao and Prince Kumar brought huge quantity of Indian made foreign liquor and kept in the house of Dhuri Yadav for illegal trade. The informant with the help of other police officials raided the house of Dhuri Yadav and recovered 85 cartoons each containing 12 bottles of liquor.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the recovery was made from the house of Dhuri Yadav. Nothing has been recovered from the house of the petitioners nor from

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.79187 of 2018(2) dt.28-01-2019 2/2

¶17

conscious possession of the petitioners. The informant illegally named the petitioners without any basis.

¶18

Having considered the facts that the petitioners are named by the informant but nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioners, the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No.757 of 2018, Excise Case No.312 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶20

Harish/-

¶21

Sanjay Sao and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Sao and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parwez Vs The State Of Bihar

Amarjit Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Saroj Kumar Mishra and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Yashoda Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Ghalaut Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Binod Bhagat @ Ram Singhasan @ Ram Singhasan Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar