Allowed

Arjun Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Nov 2019CR. MISC./58824/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants interim bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving charges of conspiracy and assault. The court directed the petitioner to be released upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two like sureties and complying with CrPC Section 438(2) conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of like amount under CrPC Section 438(2).

Arjun Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58824 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2019 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ARJUN YADAV Son of Late Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village-Belsand, Police Station-Barauli (Madhopur O.P.), District-Gopalganj.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 07-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶10

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barauli (Madhopur O.P.) P.S.Case No.145 of 2019 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 341, 307, 354, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

As per FIR, the petitioner is said to have assaulted by spade on the head of the brother of the informant. There are allegations of assault against the other accused persons and against the other accused persons there is allegation of outraging the modesty also.

¶12

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that due to land dispute, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the injury is found to be simple in

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58824 of 2019(4) dt.07-11-2019 2/2

¶14

nature.

¶15

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶16

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM XIV, Gopalganj in connection with Barauli (Madhopur O.P.) P.S.Case No.145 of 2019, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶17

With the above direction, this application is allowed.

¶18

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶19

chn/-

¶20

Arjun Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baijnath Singh @ Baidhnath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Aman Sahni Vs the State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar