Allowed

Sanjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Nov 2019CR. MISC./58213/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case under Sections 498A, 420, 506, 494, and 34 IPC. The court allowed the application subject to conditions including surrender within six weeks, furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two local sureties, and cooperating with the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on surrender or arrest; bail bond of Rs. 25,000; two local sureties required; surrender within six weeks.

Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58213 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJEET KUMAR Son of Sri Lalan Rai Resident of Village - Makhaniya Kuan, In the Gali of Umakant Jha, P.S.- Pirbahore, Distt - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 06-11-2019

¶12

Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 49 of 2019, G.R. No. 4214 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 420, 506, 494, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

As per F.I.R. petitioner has solemnized marriage with informant and later on she came to know that petitioner would marry with some other lady. On that information she went to the petitioner place and petitioner informed that he is solemnizing marry on the pressure of his family member.

¶14

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no chit of paper regarding marriage of informant and even photograph of the marriage to show solemnization of marriage between the informant and petitioner. He has been falsely implicated in this case.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58213 of 2019(4) dt.06-11-2019 2/2

¶16

It appears that O.P. No. 2 was also noticed, on notice O.P. No. 2 has also appeared by filing Vakalatnama but none appears on behalf of the opposite party no. 2.

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

Having heard both sides, considering the above submission, this application allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1^{st class} Patna in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.-49 of 2019, G.R. No. 4214 of 2019 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned with further condition that he will cooperate in the investigation and appear before the police as and when require.

¶19

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶20

T.Kr./-

¶21

U T

Sanjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Binay Kumar Poddar @ Ram Binay Poddar Vs The State of Bihar

Ritu Raj @ Reeturaj Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Shahabuddin Vs The State of Bihar

Baijnath Singh @ Baidhnath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Jha @ Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar