Allowed

Vicky Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Nov 2019CR. MISC./56662/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an anticipatory bail application, directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate to release him upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, subject to statutory conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Vicky Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56662 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2018 Thana- SILAO District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VICKY KUMAR @ RITESH KUMAR Son of Durga Prasad Resident of Village-Pokharpur, P.S-Giriyak, District-Nalanda.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hansraj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 06-11-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Silao P.S.Case no.192/18 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

As per the FIR, it appears that some altercation in between the children took place in the school and it is alleged that when the father of Shalu Kumari and and Nikki Kumari went to the house of one Bablu Kumar to make complaints he fired on the father of the informant causing injury to him. So far this petitioner is concerned there is allegation that they surrounded the deceased.

¶14

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56662 of 2019(4) dt.06-11-2019 2/2

¶16

that the police after investigation has submitted final form not finding the case true against him and the cognizance of the offence has been taken and moreover there is no allegation of firing on the petitioner.

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Silao P.S.Case No.192 of 2018 dated 31.8.2018, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

With the above direction, this application is allowed.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

chn/-

¶22

Vicky Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vicky Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Binay Kumar Poddar @ Ram Binay Poddar Vs The State of Bihar

Ritu Raj @ Reeturaj Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Shahabuddin Vs The State of Bihar

Baijnath Singh @ Baidhnath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Jha @ Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar