Allowed

Saryug Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Sept 2019CR. MISC./58307/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On 18-09-2019, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to an aged man who apprehended arrest for offenses including voluntarily causing hurt and attempt to murder. The order imposed specific conditions, including the release of a close relative as a bailor and ensuring physical presence in court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount subject to specified conditions.

Saryug Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58307 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2019 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SARYUG RAM S/o Late Shiv Pal Ram R/o Village- Maricha Ram, P.S.Sarai, District- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

=============== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the State For the State ==============	==== : : : ====	=================================== Mr.Yugal Kishore, Advocate Ms.Rupa Kumari,Advocate Mr.Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta,APP Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate ===================================
CORAM: HONOU	RABL	E MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 18-09-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 193/2019.

¶13

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and there is case and counter case between the parties. In any event the injuries are simple in nature and do not prove the accusation of assault with iron rod as the injuries are said to have been caused by sharp cutting object. The petitioner is an aged person of about 80 years, who claims clean antecedents.

¶14

Learned APP assisted by learned counsel for the informant appears and opposes the anticipatory bail petition.

¶15

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58307 of 2019(2) dt.18-09-2019 2/2

¶17

193/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

¶18

(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶19

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶20

ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶22

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶23

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶24

Chandran/-

¶25

U T

Saryug Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saryug Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Saurabh @ Jaki Dubey @ Jaiki Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Ankesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kiran Agarwal Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Saddam Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Laddu Kumar Srivastava Vs The State of Bihar