Criminal Miscellaneous petition seeking anticipatory bail for Manoj Yadav, falsely implicated in assault. Court dismissed petition due to seriousness of injury observed (stitches required) and gravity of offense.
No bail granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38598 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2019 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Naresh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 18-09-2019
In paragraph 3 of the order dated 01.07.2019, Manoj
Yadav has been inadvertently typed as petitioner no.3 in place of the petitioner no.1.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38598 of 2019(3) dt.18-09-2019 2/2
the informant appears and opposes the petition.
(Vikash Jain, J)
HR/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner no.1 is entitled to anticipatory bail despite false implication allegations.
Whether injury sustained by the informant contrary to initial observation justifies dismissal of bail.
Manoj Yadav
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
