Allowed

Ankesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Sept 2019CR. MISC./58429/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted provisional anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused of kidnapping under Sections 366/34 IPC. The bail was conditional upon their surrender within six weeks, appearance with the victim, and furnishing a bond with sureties, subject to automatic cancellation if conditions are not met.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners were granted provisional bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding surrender, cooperation, and appearance with the victim

Ankesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58429 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2016 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ankesh Kumar.

¶5

Krishna Kumar @ Sachin. Both are son of Subodh Sah, resident of Village - Haflaganj, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 17-09-2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 310/2016.

¶16

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the accusation of kidnapping of the informant's daughter. As a matter of fact, the informant's married daughter was in love with the petitioner no.1 with whom she has herself solemnized marriage with the consent of her husband and thereafter also had an issue from the marriage. The petitioner no.2 is the brother of petitioner no.1 and both claim clean antecedent.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58429 of 2019(2) dt.17-09-2019 2/3

¶18

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 310/2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions -

¶19

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

¶20

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

(iii) That the petitioners shall cooperate the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶22

(iv) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58429 of 2019(2) dt.17-09-2019 3/3

¶24

learned Court concerned.

¶25

(v). The petitioners shall appear before the learned court below along with the victim girl.

¶26

The provisional bail granted to the petitioners' shall be confirmed by the learned court below upon appearance of the victim girl, within a further period of four weeks after furnishing bail bonds, failing which their bail bonds shall stand automatically cancelled.

¶27

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶28

Prakash Narayan /- U

Ankesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Mustakim @ Mustakim Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Rita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Saurabh @ Jaki Dubey @ Jaiki Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Kiran Agarwal Vs the State of Bihar

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Paswan Vs The State of Bihar