Dismissed

Sanjeev Jha @ Sanjeev Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Nov 2019CR. MISC./57905/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court rejected the petitioners application for anticipatory bail regarding charges of cheque dishonour and cheating. The judge directed the petitioner to surrender and seek regular bail from the lower court, citing the petitioner failure to return the deposited money despite the closure of the non-banking firm.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail not granted; petitioner directed to surrender and seek regular bail from the lower court.

Sanjeev Jha @ Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57905 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2019 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJEEV JHA @ SANJEEV KUMAR Son of Dhanesh Chandra Jha Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S. - Sabaur, Distt. - Bhagalpur (Bihar).

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Lalan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 06-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sabaur PS Case no.28/19 registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504, 506, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per FIR, the petitioner happens to be LIC agent and the informant has given amount of Rs.3,10,000/- in installment on the plea that he will deposit the same against the policy but he has not deposited the same.

¶13

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the money has been taken for depositing in the nonbanking but the bank has closed and he has also filed a complaint case against the bank also.

¶14

Ont he other hand the learned counsel for the informant

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57905 of 2019(4) dt.06-11-2019 2/2

¶16

has submitted that the non banking company was closed in the year, 2015 but in spite of that the petitioner has taken amount for depositing the same but not returning the amount now.

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail.

¶19

With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

chn/-

¶22

U T

Sanjeev Jha @ Sanjeev Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Jha @ Sanjeev Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Binay Kumar Poddar @ Ram Binay Poddar Vs The State of Bihar

Ritu Raj @ Reeturaj Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Shahabuddin Vs The State of Bihar

Baijnath Singh @ Baidhnath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar