The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody, in a theft case involving Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC, upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56713 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2019 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna
======================================================
UMA DEVI, aged 50 years (F), Wife of Mukesh Das, Resident of Lala Toli, Hansraj ki Deohari, Police Station-Khajekala, Town and District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr.Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 06-09-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 22.06.2019 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 28.02.2019, some unknown thieves have committed theft in his Flat No. 103, K.R. Enclave, after breaking the lock. He found that one Almirah was badly damaged and stolen away two silver coins of 25-25 grams and two golden coins of 10 gram and 5 gram. Theft was also committed in ‘Shiv Sunila Apartment’ of Flat No. 101 and stolen away the articles about Rs. 25-30 thousand including ornaments.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56713 of 2019(2) dt.06-09-2019 2/2
petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade.
On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. She has got criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.II, Danapur, in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 108/2019.
U.K./-
U T
(Sudhir Singh, J)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Uma Devi
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
