Allowed

Pawan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Sept 2019CR. MISC./56426/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous order granted bail to petitioner Pawan Kumar in a theft case. The court directed release upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, noting the petitioner was not in the FIR and witnesses were not tampered with.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount before the betwain J.M. 1st Class.

Pawan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56426 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-368 Year-2019 Thana- KANKARBAG District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PAWAN KUMAR Son of Sammi Yadav Resident of Village - and P.O. and P.S.- Routara, Dist.- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kr Singh No.1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 06-09-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 356 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Prosecution allegation, in short, is that an amount of Rs. 84,000/- of informant along with other articles was looted by the accused persons

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 10.7.2019. Chargesheet/prosecution report has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of his self-confession made before the Police in connection with another case. There is

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56426 of 2019(2) dt.06-09-2019 2/2

¶18

no recovery of any incriminating articles from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has not been put on T.I.P.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Madhavi Singh, J.M. 1^st Class, Patna in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 368/2019.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

Pankaj/-

Pawan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chhotu @ Pradeep Vs the State of Bihar

Niraj Kumar @ Golu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Lallu Prasad Yadav @ Karu Vs the State of Bihar

Adalat Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Uma Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Kumar Ray Vs the State of Bihar