Petitioner challenging refusal to extend time to furnish a bail bond. Court accepted explanation, quashed the refusal, and directed filing within six weeks.
Impugned order quashed; petitioner directed to file bail bond within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53851 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2018 Thana- KUMAR KHAND District- Madhepura
======================================================
Manju Devi, Wife of Babloo Ram @ Bavlu Ram, Resident of Village - Matkuriya, P.S. - Triveniganj, District - Supaul
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 23-09-2019
Heard the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53851 of 2019 dt.23-09-2019 2/2
doing work of labour, she earned money and thereafter she appeared for filing of the bail bond.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Kundan/-
| AFR/NAFR | N.A. |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N.A. |
| Uploading Date | 24.09.2019 |
| Transmission Date | 24.09.2019 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's statement of acquiring funds through labour constitutes a reasonable explanation for the delayed furnishing of the bail bond.
Manju Devi
The State of Bihar
Birendra Kumar Oral
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
