In Cr. Misc. 41408 of 2019, the Patna High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail petition filed by Manish Rai regarding charges under Section 387 IPC. The Court refused to grant bail based on the nature of accusations and the gravity of the alleged offence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41408 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2017 Thana- TAJPUR DistrictSamastipur
======================================================
MANISH RAI, aged about 34 years, male, Son of Shukrit Ray Resident of Village - North Dhamoun, P.S.- Patori, Dist.- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 05-07-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41408 of 2019(2) dt.05-07-2019 2/2
accused in one prior case of different nature.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar/BT
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest for offences under Section 387 IPC.
Manish Rai
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
