Allowed

Ravindra Prasad v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jul 2019CR. MISC./41202/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An oral order granted bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest under sections 461 and 379 IPC in a criminal case before the Patna High Court, specifying conditions regarding sureties, court presence, and investigation cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on bond of Rs.10,000/ with two sureties of like amount each, subject to specified conditions including court presence and investigation cooperation.

Ravindra Prasad Vs the State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41202 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2019 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAVINDRA PRASAD S/o Late Deochand Bhagat R/o Village- Janipur Chack Manjhi, P.S.- Janipur, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Subodh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Indra Kumar Singh

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 04-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 461 and 379 IPC registered in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 159 of 2019.

¶15

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusation at the instance of the informant CDPO against the petitioner who is admittedly working as Clerk in the office are highly improbable and there was no occasion for the petitioner to have the lock broken as he himself had a key of the office. The petitioner has maintained an unblemished record of service and claims clean antecedents.

¶16

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM II, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 159 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41202 of 2019(2) dt.04-07-2019 2/2

¶18

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶19

ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶21

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶22

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶23

Chandran/-

¶24

U T

Ravindra Prasad v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Prasad v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Rupesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ganesh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Mahabir Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Sri Kant Yadav and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Jakibul Khan @ Jakibul Khan Vs The State of Bihar