This oral order dismissed an anticipatory bail petition. The court held the petition was not maintainable based on a Division Bench decision and directed the petitioners to surrender.
Petitioners directed to surrender to CJM Aurangabad in connection with Amba P.S. Case No. 23 of 2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41189 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2010 Thana- AMBA District-
Aurangabad
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 04-07-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41189 of 2019(2) dt.04-07-2019 2/2
decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench in the case of Mahendra Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar, 2004(3) PLJR 491, the present anticipatory bail petition held to be not maintainable.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar/BT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail petition is maintainable under the decision in Mahendra Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar, 2004(3) PLJR 491.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mahendra Prasad Singh Vs. The State of BiharFollowed¶22
Mahendra Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar, 2004(3) PLJR 491
Mahabir Yadav
Shakuntala Devi
Sikesh Yadav
Bindeshwar Yadav
Gopal Yadav
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
