The Patna High Court dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail dismissing it as the victim sustained grievous injuries, specifically a fracture of the left ulna, indicating that privilege is inappropriate. The court rejected the plea despite claims of false implication and clean antecedents.
Discipation of the petition for anticipatory bail granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37397 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2018 Thana- SANOKHAR DistrictBhagalpur
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Indeshwari Prasad Mandal, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 20-06-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37397 of 2019(2) dt.20-06-2019 2/2
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners apprehending arrest in an assault and bond-forced honours case involving grievous injury.
CHOTU YADAV
Angad Yadav
Awdhesh Yadav
THE STATE OF BIHAR
VIKASH JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
