An oral order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner arrested under various IPC sections. The court allowed bail on ₹10,000 with two sureties, subject to standard conditions.
Petitioner released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to specific conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37375 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2015 Thana- SIMRI District- Darbhanga
======================================================
Fakira Das @ Fakir Kahar, aged about 50 years Male Son of Jeetan Das Resident of Village - Kajiyana, P.S.- Simri, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Kedar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 20-06-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37375 of 2019(2) dt.20-06-2019 2/2
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 58 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. and with further conditions --
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(iv) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
BT/-
U T
(Vikash Jain, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail in light of allegations of false implication and past enmity.
Fakira Das @ Fakir Kahar
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
