This court modified the order dated 03.01.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 64403 of 2018 by reading the provision for a 'four weeks' period as 'eight weeks', considering the petitioner's five-day delay in depositing funds due to paucity.
Condition (i) of the order dated 03.01.2019 modified to read 'eight weeks' instead of 'four weeks'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29341 of 2019 In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64403 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2018 Thana- TANDWA DistrictAurangabad
======================================================
... ... Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate. For the Opposite Parties: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 19-06-2019
The present petition has been filed for modification of
the order dated 03.01.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 64403 of 2018.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29341 of 2019(2) dt.19-06-2019 2/2
period of “four weeks” stipulated in condition no. (i) of the order dated 03.01.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 64403 of 2018 shall be read as
“eight weeks”.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar/BT
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the stipulated period for deposit in an earlier bail-related order should be modified to account for a five-day delay in fund availability?
Kailash Yadav
Rahul Kumar
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
