Allowed

Pappu Kumar Rai @ Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Rai v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Aug 2019CR. MISC./35542/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an anticipatory bail petition where the petitioner, apprehending arrest in a case under section 307 IPC and the Mines Act, sought bail. The court granted bail on furnishing security bonds subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount within four weeks of the order.

Pappu Kumar Rai @ Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Rai Vs the State of… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35542 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2018 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PAPPU KUMAR RAI @ PAPPU KUMAR @ PAPPU RAI Son of Jibachh Rai Resident of Village- Belsandi Tara, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR

¶8

The Secretary, Mines Department, Govt. of Bihar

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kundan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Naresh Dixit, Spl. PP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 08-08-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the

¶13

State.

¶14

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Waris Nagar P.S. Case No. 263 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 40 of the Mines and Mineral Act.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion merely because he is owner of the truck in question. Petitioner had no knowledge about the seized articles. The Driver and Khalasi of the vehicle have already been enlarged on bail. Petitioner was not present at the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35542 of 2019(3) dt.08-08-2019 2/2

¶17

place of occurrence.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Waris Nagar P.S. Case No. 263 of 2018 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶19

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶20

mcv/-

¶21

U T

Pappu Kumar Rai @ Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Kumar Rai @ Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uday Choudhary @ Uday Kumar Choudhary @ Raja Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Rahman Vs the State of Bihar

Dinesh Das Vs The State of Bihar

Paras Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Rita Devi @ Rita Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Dayanand Singh Vs The State of Bihar